IPMX vs. ST 2110: Where Each Fits

Both IPMX and ST 2110 aim to move video, audio, and data over IP, but they serve different audiences. In 2025, understanding where each fits is essential for making the right technology decisions.

ST 2110 in Broadcast

ST 2110 was designed for professional broadcast and production. It emphasizes precision timing, scalability, and interoperability between vendors. With features like PTP synchronization and NMOS-based control, it supports demanding environments such as live sports and 24/7 playout centers.

The trade-off is complexity: 2110 requires disciplined network design, QoS configuration, and ongoing monitoring.

IPMX for Pro AV

IPMX (Internet Protocol Media Experience) was derived from 2110 but tailored for Pro AV. It simplifies deployment by relaxing some of the requirements, making it easier to adopt in classrooms, boardrooms, and live event venues. Timing is optional, and discovery is streamlined for plug-and-play operation.

That makes IPMX attractive for integrators who need interoperability without the full weight of broadcast engineering.

Key Differences

• Timing: Mandatory in 2110, optional in IPMX.
• Complexity: 2110 requires specialized networking knowledge; IPMX aims for simplicity.
• Use cases: 2110 dominates in broadcast; IPMX focuses on AV installations.
• Interoperability: Both build on NMOS concepts, but IPMX prioritizes ease of use.

Making the Choice

If you are building a broadcast plant or a live production facility, ST 2110 is the right fit. If you are deploying AV systems where ease of installation is critical, IPMX provides a lighter-weight alternative. Knowing which standard matches your workflow saves time and prevents costly missteps.